Julius Caesar Seminar Questions Essay - 1312 Words

Julius Caesar Seminar Questions 1. When Caesar says that Cassius thinks too much, I agree. Cassius tends to look into the details and over think simple situations. He becomes very meticulous about how the group of the conspirators is organized. Also, while Cassius is the one who originally comes up with the idea of the conspiracy and that he wants Brutus to be in charge, he thinks through the plan, yet does not want to take responsibility. Cassius just about argues with himself, due to too many thoughts running through his mind. He thinks about so vile a thing as Caesar! But, O grief, where hast thou led me? I perhaps speak this before a willing bondman. Then I know my answer must be made. But I am armed and dangers to me†¦show more content†¦In his eyes, he walks on water to all of those that are his supporters and followers. Caesar is overly confident, providing reason to the motivations of the conspirators in their quest to assassinate Caesar. 5. The third plebei an’s cry of â€Å"Let him be Caesar,† (3.2.52) is ironic because, while the people do not know of the truth being the conspiracy, the goal was to take out Caesar, not replace him. While their quest seems successful, the true hardships have yet to begin. 6. In the play, Shakespeare portrays the common man as almost incoherent. The people constantly seem to be easily swayed by the words of each and every important character. Also, all of the common people are followers. Not one stands up to the officials. At one moment, they are saying, â€Å"This Caesar was a tyrant,† (3.2.74) and the next they say that they must â€Å"tear him to pieces! He’s a conspirator,† (3.3.29), now angered with the retaliation against Caesar. 7. Shakespeare portrays the noblemen in the play as gallant but also cowards. While they follow through with what they originally decide to believe in, in the end, they are left questioning their motives. While I commend them for following through with their original endeavors, they begin to get rather brutal. An example is when Antony creates a hit list and says that, â€Å"these many, then, shall die; their names are pricked,† (4.1.1-2). The noblemen want to be noble and honorable, yet they go to such brutal extremes. 8.Show MoreRelatedJulius Caesar Seminar Questions On Brutus Essay730 Words   |  3 PagesRhett Gregory Mrs. Dolch English 2 PDP P. 4 25 January 2015 Julius Caesar Seminar Questions 1. Brutus does not want the conspirators to swear an oath of allegiance because he feels an oath is just words. They do not need an oath to prove that they are willing to take action. â€Å"No, not an oath. If not the face of men, the sufferance of our souls, the time’s abuse—if these be motives weak, break off betimes, and every man hence to his idol bed† (2. 1. 114-116). Brutus is one to take action and notRead MoreThe Studio System Essay14396 Words   |  58 PagesPride and Prejudice (1940 - bw), Blossoms in the Dust (1941 - color), Gaslight (1944 bw), The Yearling (1946 - color), Little Women (1949 - color), An American in Paris (1951 - color), The Bad and The Beautiful (1952 - bw), Julius Caesar (1953 - bw), Somebody Up There Likes Me (1956 - bw). He was nominated for Wizard of Oz in 1939, but didnt win. In some ways you could say that Cedric Gibbons was the most influential set designer of the 1930s, because he controlledRead MoreLimitation of Trait Theory12233 Words   |  49 Pagesleader decision-making styles, which are labeled AI, AII, CI, CII, and G. These styles range from strongly autocratic (AI), to strongly democratic (G). According to the theory, the appropriate style is determined by answers to up to eight diagnostic questions, which relate to such contingency factors as the importance of decision quality, the structure of the problem, whether subordinates have enough information to make a quality decision, and the importance of subordinate commitment to the decision.Read MoreContemporary Issues in Management Accounting211377 Words   |  846 Pagesmeasure’. As with the term ‘creative accounting’, however, this expression reXects an ironic acknowledgement of the limits of our abilities to control behaviour through performance measurement, not of our success. Over the decades since Ridgway wrote, questions of performance measurement and evaluation have been associated with a wide variety of issues. Frequently, discussions of the topic have addressed more general concerns with organizational management and competitiveness in the context of contemporary